Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sai v GEA Lawyers Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1896 File numbers: NSD 2171 of 2019 NSD 244 of 2020 NSD 245 of 2020
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2020
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – settlement approval – s 33V(1) of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – settlement distribution scheme – where confidentiality order sought as to terms of settlement – application allowed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA; ss 33V, 37AG, 37AG(1)
Cases cited: Adams v Navra Group Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1157 Liverpool City Council v McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc (now known as S&P Global Inc) [2018] FCA 1289
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 14 May 2020
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms B Tronson with Ms A Cameron
Solicitor for the Applicants: William Roberts Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J Hutton
Solicitor for the Respondents: Gilchrist Connell
ORDERS NSD 2171 of 2019
BETWEEN: MIZUKI SAI Applicant
AND: GEA LAWYERS PTY LTD (ACN 169 919 724) First Respondent MS JIA HONG ZOU Second Respondent
NSD 244 of 2020
BETWEEN: XIA ZHAO Applicant
AND: DLZ LAWYERS PTY LTD (ACN 159 300 017) First Respondent
LIN ZHANG Second Respondent
NSD 245 of 2020
BETWEEN: JIANYU HUANG Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate