Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Okewood Pty Ltd v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (No 3) [2021] FCA 2 File number: WAD 97 of 2013
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 15 January 2021
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE - legal professional privilege - search warrants - where hard copy documents and data seized in 2012 and 2014 - where data reduction process implemented to reduce volume of data to be reviewed for privilege - where applicants contend respondent's agents and others may have breached terms of access agreements and breached orders prescribing data reduction process - where applicants contend privileged content may have been accessed - where respondent denies claims of breach and denies access to privileged documents - where dispute as to claims of breach not determined - documents and data the subject of claims for privilege subsequently identified - documents and data where no privilege claim applies also identified - where applicants seek injunctive or other relief to prevent access by nominated persons to non-privileged documents and data - whether appropriate to prevent access to non-privileged documents CASE MANAGEMENT - where documents seized under warrants rather than produced under discovery or other procedural powers - whether appropriate to exercise case management powers to restrict access EQUITY - whether equitable relief should be granted to limit access to non-confidential information - whether justified to protect from possibility of any misuse of privileged information
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate