Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
APH17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 23 Appeal from: APH17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 3286
File number: WAD 577 of 2019
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 27 January 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where the Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant the appellant a protection visa – whether the failure to exercise or to consider exercising the power under s 473DC of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to get up-to-date country information was unreasonable – whether failure was material – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 473DC, 473DD
Cases cited: AUS17 v Minister of Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37 BCQ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 365 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; (2019) 373 ALR 196 CCQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1641 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 269 FCR 134 EVS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 268 FCR 299 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217 SZJTQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 172 FCR 563
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate