Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2021] FCA 24 File number: SAD 154 of 2020
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 29 January 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of a Registrar's decision under r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to reject documents for filing – whether original application and accompanying documents are frivolous and vexatious – application dismissed.
Legislation: Australian Constitution ss 51(xxiv), 51(xxv) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1), 7(1)(a), 11(1)(c) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss s 53(a), 53AA, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26, 31.01(1), 36.01(1)
Cases cited: Bizuneh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 42; (2003) 128 FCR 353 Donoghue and Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2020] FCA 1675 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2020] FCA 1676 Nyoni v Murphy [2018] FCAFC 75; (2018) 261 FCR 164
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 32
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS SAD 154 of 2020
BETWEEN: TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS Applicant
AND: NIC PARKYN, ACTING NATIONAL JUDICIAL REGISTRAR AND DISTRICT REGISTRAR FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate