Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CZP20 v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2021] FCA 61 File number: SAD 99 of 2020
Judgment of: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for leave to amend Originating application — where the proposed amendment challenges two decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and a decision of the Migration Agents Registration Authority — the Court has jurisdiction to hear a challenge to the two decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal but does not have jurisdiction to hear a challenge to the Migration Agents Registration Authority's decision to cancel the applicant's registration as a migration agent under s 303 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 42A, 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 292, 303, 306, 314, 474, 476A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Div 33.2
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of hearing: 27 January 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent entered a submitting notice, save as to costs
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr N Swan
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
ORDERS SAD 99 of 2020
BETWEEN: CZP20 Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate