Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wilson v Britten-Jones (No 3) [2021] FCA 63 File number: NSD 214 of 2019
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs to be paid forthwith – where application for leave to commence proceedings refused – where remaining claims are unrelated to application for leave to commence proceedings – where interlocutory application for injunction refused – where notice to produce partly successful –whether good reason exists to depart from ordinary principles
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1984 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth) Partnership Act 1891 (SA)
Cases cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 13) [1995] FCA 1459 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 60; 105 FCR 136 Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 Life Airbag Company of Australia Pty Ltd v Life Airbag Company (New Zealand) Ltd [1998] FCA 545 The Owners – Strata Plan No 87231 v 3A Composites GmbH (No 2) [2020] FCA 333 Wilson v Britten-Jones [2019] FCA 747 Wilson v Britten-Jones (No 2) [2020] FCA 1290 Wotton v State of Queensland (No 6) [2017] FCA 245
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate