Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Bullock v AJ & Co Lawyers Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 149 File number: QUD 393 of 2020
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 8 February 2021
Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT – application for declaration that variations to employment contract were void and of no effect – whether applicant was employed by first or second respondent – where second respondent partnership listed as employer for purposes of JobKeeper Scheme PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether matter suitable for remission to Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where claim is modest in value – where facts unique to case – where serious breach of s 557A Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) alleged – remitted to Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 557A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 32AB Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 27.12
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 8 February 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Allan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Walt Allan Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms S Moody
Solicitor for the Respondents: AJ & Co Lawyers Pty Ltd
ORDERS QUD 393 of 2020
BETWEEN: CARLY ANN FRANCES BULLOCK Applicant
AND: AJ & CO LAWYERS PTY LTD ACN 611 750 059 First Respondent AJ & CO LAWYERS, PARTNERSHIP ABN 55 464 159 383 Second Respondent
ANDREW GUY JOHNSON (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
order made by: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 8 FEBRUARY 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate