Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BYH19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 157 Appeal from: BYH19 v Minister For Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 3310
File number: NSD 2089 of 2019
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 3 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court –protection visa application – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to give real, genuine and proper consideration to a newspaper report and DFAT information - whether Tribunal engaged in illogical and/or irrational reasoning – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 36(2)
Cases cited: AWG18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 744 BMP15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1291 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 46; 268 FCR 362 DTN16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1525 DZT18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1639 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS and Another [2013] FCAFC 114; 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 SZLGP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1470; 181 FCR 113 SZTFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 562
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate