Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Bettencourt v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 162 File number: WAD 258 of 2020
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke cancellation decision made under s 501(3A) – whether the Minister gave proper, genuine and realistic consideration to, or engaged in an active intellectual process with, representations regarding the applicant's suicide risk – whether the Minister gave proper, genuine and realistic consideration to representations regarding the best interests of the applicant's children – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 501, 501CA, 501G
Cases cited: BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 93 ALJR 1091 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 ETA067 v Republic of Nauru (2018) 92 ALJR 1003 GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 274 FCR 202 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ (2018) 266 FCR 591 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 267 FCR 200 SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 150 ALD 34 Webb v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 831
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate