Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 170 File number: VID 1141 of 2018
Judge: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2021
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – pecuniary penalty for infringement of s 12DB(1)(i) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) – appropriate approach to assessment of civil penalty – whether a single penalty is required to be imposed for each contravening act – the circumstances in which an aggregate penalty may be ordered for multiple contraventions – relevance of contrition to deterrence – relevance of damage to health and reputation
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12BG, 12DA(1), 12DB(1)(i), 12GBA Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 76 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2 (Australian Consumer Law) s 224 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 912A, 917D, 1041H(1)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 188 FCR 238 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation (2018) 262 FCR 243 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1932; 140 ACSR 561 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 2151; 140 ACSR 635 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GE Capital Finance Australia, in the matter of GE Capital Finance Australia [2014] FCA 701 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healy (No 2) (2011) 196 FCR 430 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wooldridge [2019] FCAFC 172 Commonwealth v Director, FWBII (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 269 ALR 1 Director, Consumer Affairs Victoria v Alpha Flight Services Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 118 Director, Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 3) [2017] FCA 1148 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Re HIH Insurance Ltd (in prov liq) and HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in prov liq); Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; 42 ACSR 80 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2010) 185 FCR 308 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited [1990] FCA 762; (1991) ATPR 41-076 Trade Practices Commission v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1995) ATPR 41-375 Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner (No 2) (2018) 267 FCR 40
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate