Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Martires v Endura Paint Pty Ltd (No 1) [2021] FCA 178 Appeal from: Martires v Endura Paints Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCCA 717
File number: WAD 125 of 2020
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 9 March 2021
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court of Australia - appellant self-represented - procedural fairness - duty of judge to apprise appellant of rules of evidence and procedure - appellant presented with new evidence going only to credibility while being cross-examined at trial - appellant not told of right to object or ask for adjournment - possibility that outcome could have been different - appellant denied procedural fairness - appropriateness of ordering new trial - appeal allowed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 102, 103, 106, 570 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 341, 343, 344 Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 28 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) r 51.53(1)
Cases cited: AMF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 68; (2016) 241 FCR 30 Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation Ltd v McAuslan (1993) 47 FCR 492 Balenzuela v De Gail (1959) 101 CLR 226 Blenkinsop v Wilson [2019] WASC 77 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 32; (2012) 248 CLR 500 Canturi Corporation Pty Ltd v Gagner Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDC 151; (2008) 8 DCLR (NSW) 17 Conway v The Queen [2002] HCA 2; (2002) 209 CLR 203 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Gambaro v Mobycom [2019] FCAFC 144; (2019) 271 FCR 530 Government Insurance Office (NSW) v Bailey (1992) 27 NSWLR 304 HT v The Queen [2019] HCA 40; (2019) 374 ALR 216 John v Rees [1970] Ch 345 Jorgensen v Fair Work Ombudsman [2019] FCAFC 113; (2019) 271 FCR 461 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Martires v Endura Paints Pty Ltd (Judicial Review) [2021] FCA 179 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Miah [2001] HCA 22; (2001) 206 CLR 57 Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36; (2018) 265 CLR 236 Orr v Holmes (1948) 76 CLR 632 Rajski v Scitec Corporation Pty Ltd (Unreported, New South Wales Court of Appeal, 16 June 1986) Re F (Litigants in Person Guidelines) [2001] FamCA 348; (2001) 27 Fam LR 517 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208; (2005) 3 DDCR 1 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 Stokes v The Queen (1960) 105 CLR 279 Stone v Braun [2015] WASCA 103; (2015) 13 ASTLR 444 SZRUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 146; (2013) 216 FCR 445 Tomasevic v Travaglini [2007] VSC 337; (2007) 17 VR 100 Whall v Stamp [2019] NSWCA 163 Windoval v Donnelly [2014] FCAFC 127; (2014) 226 FCR 89 WZASS v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 856
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate