Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Saunders on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2021] FCA 190 File number: QUD 784 of 2019
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – application for determination of compensation under ss 50(2) and 61(1) – where no compensable act identified in original application – whether application complies with s 61(5) – where application by State for strike-out under s 84C – where applicant seeks leave to amend to include compensable act – where applicant applies for relief under s 83A – application for leave to amend original application dismissed – original application struck out – application for relief under s 83A dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 23(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01 Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) ss 7(1), 8(5), 10 and 13(1) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 17, 20, 22D, 22G, 23B, 23F, 23I, 23J, 24FA, 24FB, 24FC, 24GB, 24GD, 24GE, 24HA, 24ID, 24JAA, 24JB, 24KA, 24MD, 24NA, 45, 48–54, 61, 61A, 62, 63, 64, 66, 66A, 81, 83A, 84, 84C, 84D, 87A, 94B, 94C, 190A, 190E, 215, 223, 225, 226, 227, 228, 232A, 233 Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) Native Title (Federal Court) Regulations 1998 (Cth) reg 5 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Mining Act 1978 (WA) s 125A Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 (Qld) Explanatory Memorandum, Native Title Amendment Bill 1996 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate