Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Khodr v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 198 File number: VID 128 of 2020
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION LAW – ss 51A, 57, 501(1) and (6)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application for judicial review of Minister's decision to refuse application for a Prospective Marriage visa – where applicant failed character test because not of good character – where applicant legally married his wife in Lebanon when she was younger than the marriageable age in Australia – whether Minister erred by treating applicant's beliefs in respect of marriageable age as "present general conduct" for the purposes of s 501(6)(c)(ii) – whether uncommunicated beliefs constitute "conduct" – whether Minister erred in his consideration of the standards and expectations of the Australian community in respect of child marriage – where Minister failed to take into account Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) as indicator of Australian expectations in relation to child marriage in foreign countries – procedural fairness – opportunity to be heard – whether Minister failed to identify to the visa applicant an issue critical to the decision – extent to which requirement to afford procedural fairness ousted by s 51A and s 57 of Subdivision AB of Migration Act – legal unreasonableness – irrationality – whether Minister erred in his consideration of the risk of the applicant's daughters entering under-age marriages – application allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 929 BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 94 BMF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1530 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 93 ALJR 1091 Chamoun v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 276 FCR 75 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Degning v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 270 FCR 451 Godley v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 774 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Godley (2005) 141 FCR 552 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 258 CLR 173 Reg. v Hunt; Ex parte Sean Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 180 CLR 322 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190 SZMUF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 182 The Queen v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate