Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CPP17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 199 Appeal from: CPP17 & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 3593
File number: SAD 255 of 2019
Judgment of: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION — appeal from an order made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing the appellants' application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority under Part 7AA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) — where the Authority affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection to refuse to grant protection visas to the appellants — whether the appellants made a claim based on past domestic violence that there was a real risk of significant harm to the first appellant in the future — whether the Authority addressed such a claim — whether it was legally unreasonable for the Authority not to consider and exercise the power in s 473DC of the Migration Act to get new information from the first appellant — whether the Authority erred in its application of s 473DD of the Migration Act to new information regarding the mental health of the second appellant — appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5AAA, 5J, 36, 57, 473CA, 473CB, 473CC, 473DA, 473DB, 473DC, 473DD, 473GA, 473GB
Cases cited: ABAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2016] FCA 721; (2016) 242 FCR 11 ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; (2020) 383 ALR 407 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37; (2020) 384 ALR 196 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 AZAAR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 912; (2009) 111 ALD 390 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; (2019) 373 ALR 196 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62; (1989) 169 CLR 379 CPP17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 1097 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; (2018) 258 FCR 551 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 43; (2019) 269 FCR 134 FSG17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 29; (2020) 274 FCR 456 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Minister v Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210; (2017) 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 [2018] FCAFC 32; (2018) 253 FCR 526 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2018) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB [2013] FCAFC 33; (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al-Miahi [2001] FCA 744; (2001) 65 ALD 141 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar [2002] HCA 14; (2002) 210 CLR 1 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; (2004) 207 ALR 12 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 264 CLR 217 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate