Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v The Country Care Group Pty Ltd (Ruling No 6) [2021] FCA 206 File number: VID 224 of 2019
Ruling of: BROMWICH J
Date of ruling: 11 March 2021
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – objection to evidence to be adduced on the basis that probative value outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant pursuant to s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – held: no real danger of unfair prejudice, evidence admissible
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 137
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Federal Crime and Related Proceedings
Number of paragraphs: 9
Date of hearing: 15 March 2021 - 1 June 2021
Date of submissions on this ruling: 5 March 2021
Counsel for the Prosecutor: O Bigos QC, R Barry, A Muhlebach, C Exell, S Tatas
Solicitor for the Prosecutor: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Counsel for the First Accused: K Morgan SC, P Strickland
Counsel for the Second Accused: D Jordan SC, S Keating
Solicitor for the First and Second Accused: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Third Accused: D Staehli SC, C Bannan
Solicitor for the Third Accused: Mills Oakley
VID 224 of 2019
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Prosecutor
AND: THE COUNTRY CARE GROUP PTY LTD First Accused
ROBERT MARTIN HOGAN Second Accused
CAMERON HARRISON Third Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate