Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd (Third Party Suppression Orders) [2021] FCA 221 File number: NSD 724 of 2016
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for suppression order – where commercially sensitive information produced by third party under subpoena – whether order necessary to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG, 37AI, 37AJ Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 24.22
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1082 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oscar Wylee (No 2) [2020] FCA 1361 Charlick Trading Pty Ltd v Australian National Railways Commission (1997) 149 ALR 647 Chief Executive Officer of Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre v TAB Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1532 Clark v Digital Wallet Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 877 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; 240 CLR 651 Motorola Solutions, Inc. v Hytera Communications Corporation (No 2) [2018] FCA 17 Steelforce Trading Pty Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 47 Titan Enterprises (Qld) Pty Ltd v Cross [2016] FCA 1275
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate