Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Frigger v Parkyn [2021] FCA 224 File number: WAD 20 of 2021
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - application for judicial review - decision of registrar not to accept documents for filing - open to registrar to find that documents were frivolous or vexatious on their face - application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 445C, 459P, 471A, 472, 1324 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26
Cases cited: A v State of New South Wales [2007] HCA 10; (2007) 230 CLR 500 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Frigger v Trott [2021] FCA 18 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1 Lee v Abedian [2016] QSC 92; [2017] 1 Qd R 549 Perera v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 10 Re Rules of Supreme Court 1971 (WA); Ex parte Kingsfield Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] WASC 16 Re Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA); Ex parte Gates [2018] WASC 213 Shaw v Buljan [2016] FCA 829; (2016) 153 ALD 252
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 41
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent filed a submitting notice
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate