Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DBX16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] FCA 238 Appeal from: DBX16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 3410
File number(s): VID 1272 of 2017
Judgment of: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 22 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review – Immigration Assessment Authority found new information did not meet criteria in s 473DD of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – no unreasonableness regarding exercise of discretion under s 473DC – no misapplication of criteria in s 473DD(b)(ii) – law, practice and procedure regarding arrest warrants in Sri Lanka not matter of everyday or ordinary human experience – finding that warrants not genuinely issued legally irrational or illogical – no probative basis – error material and jurisdictional – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), Pt 7AA
Cases cited: ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; 383 ALR 407 ANO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 59 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 37 at [6]; 384 ALR 196 BDY18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 24; 273 FCR 170 BNV18 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 378 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; 373 ALR 196 BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; 254 FCR 221 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 CSR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 474 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; 258 FCR 551 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 43; 269 FCR 134 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110 DYK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 222; 267 FCR 69 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CLV16 [2018] FCAFC 80; 260 FCR 482 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210; 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BTW17 [2020] FCAFC 159 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; 264 CLR 217 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1; 74 ALJR 405; 168 ALR 407 Staindl v Frydenberg [2020] FCAFC 41; 276 FCR 301 The Republic of Nauru v WET040 (No 2) [2018] HCA 60; 362 ALR 235; 93 ALJR 102 Viane v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 144 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate