Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Garde-Wilson v Google LLC [2021] FCA 243 File number: VID 94 of 2020
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 18 March 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders for pre-action discovery outside the scope of the originating application and the interlocutory application – application refused – proceeding dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.22, 7.23, 10.43 Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002 (USA) Stored Communications Act (USA)
Cases cited: Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1348 Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10; (2002) 210 CLR 491 Schaefer v Universal Scaffolding & Equipment LLC 839 F. 3d 599 SmithKline Beecham plc v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 271
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 32
Date of hearing: 18 March 2021
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Mr M Stanarevic of Matrix Legal
ORDERS VID 94 of 2020
BETWEEN: ZARAH GARDE-WILSON Prospective Applicant
AND: GOOGLE LLC Prospective Respondent
order made by: MURPHY J DATE OF ORDER: 18 MARCH 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate