Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ireland v Dunne [2021] FCA 245 File number: VID 14 of 2021
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2021
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – from Australia – bail – judicial review – whether magistrate misconstrued applicable test – whether irrelevant matters taken into consideration – whether denial of procedural fairness – whether the magistrate's reasons were inadequate
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 12, 15, 16, 18, 19 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Cabal v United Mexican States (No 2) (2000) 171 ALR 305 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Director of Public Prosecutions of the Commonwealth v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35; (1995) 185 CLR 528 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 43; (2019) 269 FCR 134 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 118 Federal Republic of Germany v Parker (1998) 166 ALR 522; (1998) 84 FCR 323 at 339 Foster v Attorney-General (1998) 158 ALR 394; (1997) 97 A Crim R 560 Ghodskani v United States of America [2018] FCA 14 Harris v Attorney-General (Commonwealth) [1994] FCA 621; (1994) 52 FCR 386 Hellenic Republic v Konstantinou [2010] FCA 708 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2018] FCAFC 135; (2018) 265 FCR 251 Matson (Roger) v Keenan [2016] FCA 1549 Matson v United States of America [2018] FCAFC 57; [2018] 260 FCR 187 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union; Minister for Jobs and Industrial Relations v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2020] HCA 29; (2020) 381 ALR 601 MZXHY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 622 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 O'Donoghue v Republic of Ireland [2009] FCA 394 Perder Investments Pty Ltd v Elmer (1991) 31 FCR 202 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Qu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1299 Republic of Poland v Ginter [2009] FCA 262 Reyes v United States of America [2020] FCAFC 149 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146; (2012) 207 FCR 277 SZJMG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1145 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262 CLR 362 Taylor v United States of America [2012] FCA 366 Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518 Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCA 206 Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCAFC 74; (2019) 269 FCR 225 United Mexican States v Cabal [2001] HCA 60; (2001) 209 CLR 165 Yacoub v United States of America [2019] FCA 1682 Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2008] FCA 1335
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate