Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Salama v Sydney Trains [2021] FCA 251 File number: NSD 1977 of 2017
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2021
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – adverse action – whether employee exercised workplace rights under s 341(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ("FW Act") – where employee member and officer of industrial association under s 346 of the FW Act – whether adverse action taken because employee exercised workplace rights and/or was member and officer of industrial association – where decision-makers gave evidence regarding reasons adverse action was taken – whether employer discharged presumption imposed by s 361 of the FW Act – application dismissed INDUSTRIAL LAW – alleged contravention of enterprise agreement contrary to s 50 of the FW Act – interpretation of enterprise agreements – whether employer denied employee rights under enterprise agreement – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 6, 12, 50 – 54, 340, 341, 342, 346, 347, 361, 789FC and 789FD Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.23
Cases cited: Amcor Limited v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2005] HCA 10; 222 CLR 241 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 32; 248 CLR 500 City of Wanneroo v Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical And Services Union [2006] FCA 813; 153 IR 426 Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 41; 253 CLR 243 Construction Forestry Mining and Energy union v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1046 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Hay Point Services Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2145 Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 697 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 265 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 157; 238 FCR 273 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clermont Coal Pty Limited [2015] FCA 1014; 253 IR 166 Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd v Keenan [2020] FCAFC 204 Elliott v Kodak Australasia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1804; 129 IR 251 Energy Australia Yallourn Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2018] FCAFC 146; 264 FCR 342 George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; 170 CLR 104 Kucks v CSR Limited [1996] IRCA 141 Mr Joseph Salama v Sydney Trains; Mr Laurence New; Ms Amba Francisco; Mr Charlie Keech; Ms Kirsty Sweeting [2018] FWC 1845 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2020] FCA 1709 National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2013] FCA 451; 234 IR 139 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) [1998] HCA 30; 195 CLR 1 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193; 257 FCR 62 PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King [2020] FCAFC 15 Red Cross v Queensland Nurses' Union of Employees [2019] FCAFC 215; 273 FCR 332 Shea v EnergyAustralia Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 167; 242 IR 159 Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 271; 242 IR 1 Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow [2015] FCAFC 62; 233 FCR 46 Wood (on behalf of the Industrial Relations Bureau) v Lord Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Melbourne (1979) 41 FLR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate