Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Watson v Kriticos (Summary Judgment) [2021] FCA 261 File number: NSD 970 of 2019
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment and strike out – application for further particulars
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 s 4 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 10.43(2), 16.02(1)(d), 16.03, 16.21(1), 26.01(a) Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters. Opened for signature 15 November 1965. 658 UNTS 163 (entered into force 10 February 1969)
Cases cited: Alati v Kruger (1955) 94 CLR 216 Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [1994] FCA 636; 217 ALR 226 Associated Alloys Pty Limited v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd [2000] HCA 25; 202 CLR 588 Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd [2020] HCA 27; 94 ALJR 715 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW [1982] HCA 24; 149 CLR 337 Ho v Akai Pty Limted (in liquidation) [2006] FCAFC 159; 247 FCR 205 Polar Aviation v Civil Aviation Authority [2012] FCAFC 97; 203 FCR 325 Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; 241 CLR 118 Watson v Kriticos (Joinder and Service Applications) [2020] FCA 1019 Wride v Schulze [2004] FCAFC 216
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate