Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
McNamara (Barngarla Southern Eyre Peninsula Native Title Claim) v State of South Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 262 File number: SAD 26 of 2020
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – costs – application for costs under s 85A(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether the applicant should pay the first respondent's costs of a successful summary dismissal application – whether it is necessary to categorise the applicant's conduct in opposing the application as unreasonable before a costs order may be made
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 85A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01
Cases cited: Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2017] FCA 844 Cheedy v Western Australia (No 2) (2011) 199 FCR 23 Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 9; 325 ALR 213 Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 2) [2016] FCA 724 De Rose v South Australia (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 137 McNamara (Barngarla Southern Eyre Peninsula Native Title Claim) v State of South Australia [2020] FCA 1875 State of Western Australia v Banjima People [2016] FCAFC 46 Ward v Western Australia (No 2) (1999) 93 FCR 305
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate