Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fepuleai v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 277 File number(s): VID 689 of 2020
Judgment of: KERR J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Minister to cancel a Class TY Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa – visa cancellation on character grounds – where Minister based much of his decision making upon the content of a Victoria Police report – whether the Minister misunderstood or misconstrued key evidence and, in doing so, misdirected himself in the exercise of his power under s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – no jurisdictional error – no more than a derisory chance that a different outcome could have been reached had the Minister dealt with [46] of the Victoria Police report differently – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 46
Date of hearing: 17 March 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Smorchevsky
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clothier Anderson Immigration Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms C Symons
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 689 of 2020
BETWEEN: ANDREW TOVIA FEPULEAI Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS Respondent
order made by: KERR J DATE OF ORDER: 17 March 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Applicant's Originating Application filed 22 October 2020 be dismissed. 2. The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs as agreed or in default of agreement as assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate