Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Cavanagh v School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Notre Dame [2021] FCA 300 File number: WAD 296 of 2020
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 30 March 2021
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – application for leave to commence proceeding otherwise barred by operation of s 46PO(3A) of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – where complaint is terminated in the Human Rights Commission because the President's delegate is not satisfied that continuation of an inquiry into the complaint is warranted – consideration of principles relevant to the Court's exercise of discretion to grant leave – whether application is reasonably arguable and at least not fanciful Held: Leave refused
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO, 46PO(3A)(a), 46PH(1)(c)
Cases cited: James v WorkPower Inc [2018] FCA 2083 Owen v Serendipity (WA) Pty Ltd t/as Advanced Personnel Management [2020] FCA 1826
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 4 March 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
ORDERS WAD 296 of 2020
BETWEEN: MICHAEL CAVANAGH Applicant
AND: SCHOOL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY, UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Respondent
order made by: MCKERRACHER J DATE OF ORDER: 30 MARCH 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to commence this proceeding, which is otherwise barred by operation of s 46PO(3A) of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth), is refused. 2. Unless the respondent applies within 10 days from the date of these orders for its costs, there be no order as to costs. 3. If the respondent does apply for its costs pursuant to order 2, it is to file and serve submissions within 10 days not exceeding three pages; the applicant will have 10 days thereafter to file submissions in response, with any such costs application to be heard and resolved on the papers, unless the Court orders otherwise. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate