Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Le v Commissioner of Taxation [2021] FCA 303 Appeal from: NGFZ v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] AATA 5410
File number: QUD 728 of 2019
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 30 March 2021
Catchwords: TAXATION – onus of proof – appeal under s 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – where Commissioner adopted asset betterment approach – where applicants submitted assessments were excessive – whether on appeal applicants had discharged onus of proof pursuant to s 14ZZK TAA – where applicants contended that taxable income as declared was accurate – where applicants made submissions capable of explaining unexplained wealth – whether Tribunal did not refer to those submissions in reasons – where adverse findings of credit made against applicants – appeal allowed TAXATION – procedural fairness – whether findings of adverse credibility amounted to error – where adverse findings of credit based on inconsistency of applicants' oral evidence – where adverse findings a matter for determination by the Tribunal – whether it was evident in Tribunal's decision that there was an inherent and illogical inconsistency – where inconsistency amounted to unreasonableness TAXATION – cross-appeal by Commissioner – where applicants successful in appeal – cross-appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 25, 33, 42C, 43, 44 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) s 8 Income Tax Assessment Act 1922 (Cth) s 39 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 177, 190 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZ, 14ZZJ, 14ZZK, 14ZZO, 350
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate