Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 307 File number: NSD 328 of 2018
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2021
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – infringement – goods of the same description – where scope of alleged infringing goods not sufficiently made clear by the parties at trial – further infringement findings PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – form of final orders – scope of declaratory and injunctive relief PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether respondents should be granted sell-through period for infringing products – whether respondents should be ordered to deliver up infringing products after sell-through period PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether respondents should be ordered to withdraw application to register trade mark found to infringe applicants' trade marks PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether orders for rectification of the Trade Marks Register are necessary where applicants have voluntarily amended their registrations PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay of determination of quantum pending appeal COSTS – whether costs should be paid as a lump sum or taxed – whether costs should be awarded on issue by issue basis – apportionment of costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23, s 24(1A), s 37AF, s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 34.48, r 36.08 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 4, s 17, s 33, s 120 Federal Court of Australia, Costs Practice Note (GPN-COSTS), 25 October 2016 Macquarie Dictionary (5th ed, 2009, Sydney)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate