Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Quach v Marks [2021] FCA 335 File number: ACD 44 of 2020
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by a non-party for leave to intervene – where respondent has filed submitting appearance – whether the proposed intervener's contribution will be useful and different from the contribution of the principal parties
Legislation: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.12
Cases cited: Gedeon v Commissioner of NSW Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; (2008) 236 CLR 120 Health Care Complaints Commission v Quach [2015] NSWCATOD 2 Health Care Complaints Commission v Quach (No 2) [2015] NSWCATOD 32 Markisic v Magistrate Heilpern [2011] NSWSC 410 Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission [2016] NSWCA 10 Wu v Avin Operations Proprietary Limited (No 3) [2006] FCA 132
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 15, 31 March 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. D Birch
Solicitor for the Respondent: NSW Crown Solicitor's Office
ORDERS ACD 44 of 2020
BETWEEN: MICHAEL VAN THANH QUACH Applicant
AND: FRANK MARKS Respondent
order made by: ABRAHAM J DATE OF ORDER: 31 March 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate