Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kitoko v University of Technology Sydney [2021] FCA 360 File number(s): NSD 911 of 2020
Judgment of: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 15 April 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory applications by applicant for default and summary judgment – interlocutory applications by ten respondents for summary judgment and strike out – whether proceeding is not maintainable because of issue estoppel or Anshun estoppel – where issues finally determined by other courts – whether proceeding is an abuse of process – whether applicant has no reasonable prospects of success – whether applicant's pleading is frivolous or vexatious – summary judgment entered in favour of each respondent – applicant's interlocutory applications dismissed
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 18, 21, 236-7 of Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 22(2) and 42 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 23, 31A Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 18 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) ss 9, 11, 17, 18C and 42 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A, 52, 82, 87, 88 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.32, 5.02, 5.22(a), 5.23(2)(c), 9.41, 11.06, 16.02, 16.11, 26.01, 36.03(a) Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate