Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DHJ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 364 Appeal from: DHJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 109
File number: NSD 1730 of 2019
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 16 April 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – whether primary Judge erred in finding that the Immigration Assessment Authority did not fail to exercise its jurisdiction by not taking into account a submission of the appellant – interpretation of Practice Direction for Applicants, Representatives and Authorised Recipients – whether Authority incorrectly applied the five page limit in the Practice Direction in rejecting a submission of the appellant – whether primary Judge erred in finding no misinterpretation of Practice Direction by the Authority
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – r 36.05 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – ss 473DD, 473FB Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014 (Cth) Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014
Cases cited: BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; 254 FCR 221 DHJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCCA 109 DHJ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 414 ELQ17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 27 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176; 257 FCR 111
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate