Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Gan v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 375 Review of: Application for judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision delivered on 23 October 2020 by Member Dr L Bygrave
File number: NSD 1216 of 2020
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 16 April 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where Tribunal upheld decision of delegate of the Minister to refuse the applicant's citizenship application – objection to competency of the application – application dismissed for lack of competency
Legislation: Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) s 21, s 22, s 22A, s 22B, s 23, s 24 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 42B(1)(b), s 44
Cases cited: Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92; 233 FCR 315
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 31
Date of hearing: 31 March 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms A Zinn of Mills Oakley
ORDERS NSD 1216 of 2020
BETWEEN: SING KIAN GAN Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
order made by: BURLEY J DATE OF ORDER: 16 April 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Notice of Objection to Competency filed on 19 November 2020 be upheld. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate