Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McCallum, in the Matter of Re Holdco Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2) [2021] FCA 377 File number: VID 285 of 2020
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where administrators have disposed of property used or in the possession of companies under administration by way of sale pursuant to orders of the Court made under s 44C(2)(c) of the Corporations Act 2010 (Cth) – where the proceeds of sale have been retained to meet the claims of persons who assert ownership or security interests in the property sold – where the administrators claim their costs out of the retained proceeds of sale – where a number of interested parties have made claims to ownership or security interests in the property sold – determination of the relative value of the property sold by administrators – consideration of different valuation methodologies proposed by expert valuers – proper approach to valuation – whether unaccepted offers to purchase an asset are admissible as direct evidence of market value of that asset INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – whether works done pursuant to technology and marketing services agreements created copyright works – whether the copyright works were sold as part of the property used or in the possession of companies under administration so as to generate some of the sale proceeds – whether relevant services agreements contained a retention of title clause which was a security interest within the meaning of section 12 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) – whether ownership of copyright works, the subject of the retention of title clause, vested in grantor of the interest EQUITY – whether a vendor's equitable lien arose under a share purchase agreement which provided for the payment of an initial purchase price and the remainder of the purchase price was deferred to a later date – where the share purchase agreement was subsequently varied – whether variations to the share purchase agreement evince an intention to exclude, abandon or waive the lien
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate