Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Booth v Thorne [2021] FCA 380 File number: VID 76 of 2021
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 16 April 2021
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for interim control orders pursuant to s 104.4 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – whether pre-conditions in s 104.4(1) are satisfied – whether controls reasonably necessary and reasonably appropriate and adapted – application granted
Legislation: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 104.4
Cases cited: Booth v Thorne [2020] FCA 445 Booth v Thorne (No 2) [2020] FCA 1196
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Federal Crime and Related Proceedings
Number of paragraphs: 6
Date of hearing: 5 March 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C. Fitzgerald
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms I. Skaburskis of Doogue and George Defence Lawyers
ORDERS VID 76 of 2021
BETWEEN: SANDRA BOOTH Applicant
AND: SHAYDEN JAMIL THORNE Respondent
order made by: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 5 MARCH 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Interim control order 1. The Court makes an interim control order pursuant to s 104.4 of the Criminal Code (Cth) in the terms set out in the Schedule to these orders. Confirmation hearing 2. The proceeding be listed for hearing on 9 June 2021 at 11:00am. Suppression order 3. There is to be no disclosure, by publication or otherwise, of: (a) the address in Control 1.1; (b) the names of third parties who are not also persons convicted of terrorism offences, in Control 5.1b; (c) in the Summary of Grounds in Annexure B, the names of third parties who are not party to this proceeding, except the names of co-accused; 4. The Information identified in Order 3 be redacted from any publicly available Court documents, including Orders. 5. Orders 3 and 4 are made under s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (on the grounds set out in s 37AG(1)(a) and (c) of that Act). 6. Orders 3 and 4 operate until further order. 7. Orders 3 and 4 do not prevent disclosure of the Information to and between the following people for the purposes of these proceedings: (a) the presiding judge and necessary staff of this Court; (b) officers and employees of agencies that are members of the Joint Counter Terrorism Team and legal representatives of those agencies; (c) the respondent and his legal representatives; (d) Commonwealth officers (as defined by s 3 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)). Endorsement pursuant to Rule 41.06 To: Shayden Thorne You will be liable to imprisonment, sequestration of property or punishment for contempt if: (a) for an order that requires you to do an act or thing - you neglect or refuse to do the act or thing within the time specified in the order; or (b) for an order that requires you not to do an act or thing - you disobey the order. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate