Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 382 File number: NSD 529 of 2020
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside orders made pursuant to r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) requiring Prospective Respondents to make preliminary discovery – Prospective Applicant commenced substantive proceedings before the Prospective Respondents complied fully with the preliminary discovery orders – application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.23, 7.25, 20.17, 20.22, 39.05
Cases cited: BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1556 Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 29
Date of hearing: 13 April 2021
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr C McMeniman
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the Prospective Respondents: Mr M Martin QC
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondents: Mills Oakley Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 529 of 2020
BETWEEN: BCI MEDIA GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 098 928 959) Prospective Applicant
AND: CORELOGIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 149 251 267) First Prospective Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate