Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Goldus Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) v Cummins (No 3) [2021] FCA 388 File number: NSD 461 of 2020
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 19 April 2021
Cases cited: Goldus Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) v Cummins [2020] FCA 959
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: 19 April 2021
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr JR Young
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: James Legal
Counsel for the First and Second Defendants: The First and Second Defendants filed submitting notices save as to costs
Counsel for the Third and Fifth Defendants: Mr DL Cook SC
Solicitor for the Third and Fifth Defendants: MathasLaw
Counsel for the Fourth Defendant: The Fourth Defendant did not appear
Counsel for the First Cross-Defendant: Mr JR Young
Solicitor for the First Cross-Defendant: James Legal
Counsel for the Second Cross-Defendant The Second Cross-Defendant did not appear
Counsel for the Cross-Claimants: Mr DL Cook SC
Solicitor for the Cross-Claimants: MathasLaw
ORDERS NSD 461 of 2020
BETWEEN: GOLDUS PTY LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT (ACN 076 662 149) Plaintiff
AND: ANDREW JOHN CUMMINS First Defendant
PETER PAUL KREJCI Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate