Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AZS21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 392 File number(s): NSD 1105 of 2020
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 20 April 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time under s 477A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) within which to seek judicial review of the Minister's decision under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – inadequate explanation for delay of approximately 8 months – whether Minister under obligation to consider the sufficiency of the applicant's representations having regard to the context in which they were prepared, namely, without professional assistance or legal training – where judicial review application would not have reasonable prospects of success – application for extension of time dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 477A, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1222 Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 55; (2019) 269 FCR 47 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jamal v Secretary of Social Services [2017] FCA 916 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198; (2018) 267 FCR 492 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 83 ALJR 1123 Paduano v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 211; (2005) 143 FCR 204 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate