Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Darnell v Stonehealth Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 398 File number: QUD 51 of 2021
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – interlocutory application for an order pursuant to s 23 of the Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) to restrain the Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (the Authority) from making any determination regarding applications in respect of certain premises – where the Authority is not due to consider the applicant's Application – where the Authority offers undertaking in respect of the applicant – interlocutory application for an order pursuant to s 23 to restrain the Authority from making any determination regarding applications in respect of a certain premises made by the fourth respondent – where the fourth respondent not pressing for substantive relief – where fourth respondent's application materially similar to the first respondent's – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – oral application to join party as the fourth respondent – where interlocutory application by the applicant withdrawn – where similar interlocutory application sought to be made orally by the fourth respondent – leave granted COSTS – application by first, second and third respondents for costs order – where applicant submitted that undertaking offered was late – whether appropriate to reserve costs in interlocutory application – costs awarded to first, second and third respondents
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 16 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 99K, 99L National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2018 (Cth) Sch 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate