Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australia Bay Seafoods Pty Ltd v Northern Territory of Australia [2021] FCA 414 File number: NTD 8 of 2020
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 23 April 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to set aside an originating application – whether the originating application raises a "matter" within the meaning of s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether the originating application raises matters which are hypothetical and have no real or immediate impact on rights and interests – interlocutory application upheld – action dismissed.
Legislation: Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) ss 178, 208A, 222A, 245, 265, 303FJ, 303FN Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 21, 31A Fisheries Act 1952 (Cth) Fisheries Legislation (Consequential Provisions) Act 1991 (Cth) s 7 Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) ss 3A, 60(1), 61, 62, 63, 66-68, 71-78 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B, 78B Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act 1978 (Cth) s 50(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 13.01(1) Criminal Justice Act 1989 (Qld) Fisheries Act 1988 (NT) ss 2A, 4(1), 21, 22, 23, 27, 58(1), 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 70A-70E Fisheries Amendment (Demersal Fishery) Regulations 2012 (NT) Fisheries Amendment (Timor Reef Fishery) Regulations 2011 (NT) Fisheries Regulations 1992 (NT) regs 106, 107A, 107B, 107E-107Z, 108-108B, 108C-108E,141F, 141H, 141J, 141JC-141JR, 141JS-141JU, 141JV-141JX
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate