Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Zafra Legal Pty Ltd v Harris (Liquidator) (No 3) [2021] FCA 441 File number: WAD 329 of 2017 WAD 630 of 2017 WAD 311 of 2018 WAD 403 of 2018
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 30 April 2021
Catchwords: COSTS - concurrent reviews of registrar's separate lump sum assessments of costs of two primary actions and two appeals
Legislation: Corporations Act 2011 (Cth) ss 530A, 530B Crimes Act 1912 (Cth) s 3N Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 3.11, Schedule 3
Cases cited: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 7) [2017] FCA 1469 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 506 Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2018] FCA 907 Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (No 2) [2018] FCA 1237 Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2019] FCAFC 123 Caratti v Harris & Kirman as Joint Liquidators of GH1 Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 124 Crescent Capital Partners Management Pty Limited v Crescent Funds Management (Aust) Limited [2019] FCA 1082 Fewin Pty Ltd v Burke (No 3) [2017] FCA 693 Geneva Laboratories Limited v Prestige Premium Deals Pty Ltd (No 5) [2017] FCA 867 Hislop v Paltar Petroleum Limited (No 4) [2017] FCA 1632 Leary v Leary [1987] 1 WLR 72; [1987] 1 All ER 261 LFDB v SM (No 4) [2017] FCA 753 Zafra Legal Pty Ltd v Harris [2018] FCA 908 Zafra Legal Pty Ltd v Harris (No 2) [2018] FCA 1236
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate