Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DTF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 446 Appeal from: DTF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2020] FCA 383
File number: NSD 1068 of 2020
Judgment of: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 27 April 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 29 April 2021
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) (Cth)
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 7
Date of hearing: 27 April 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G Johnson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS NSD 1068 of 2020
BETWEEN: DTF17 Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
order made by: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 27 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MIDDLETON J: 1 This application was called on for hearing today as scheduled in the Court List. There was no appearance for or by the Applicant. 2 I propose that the application for an extension of time to appeal be dismissed with costs. 3 The power to do so is found in s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) (Cth) when read in conjunction with s 25(2BA). 4 It is a matter for the Court's discretion as to whether the power to dismiss should be exercised when an applicant fails to appear before the Court. 5 The Applicant has been notified in the normal course, and yesterday by email sent by the Minister's solicitors, that the hearing would be on today at 10.15 am before this Court. My associate has also just attempted to call the mobile number on the application form filed by the Applicant, and the call could not be connected. 6 I am satisfied that appropriate notice has been given to the Applicant of the hearing today. Neither the Court nor the Minister has received any excuse or explanation for non-attendance, and in those circumstances there will be no justification to adjourn the hearing or proceed other than to dismiss the application with costs. 7 I order that the application for an extension of time to appeal be dismissed with the costs. I certify that the preceding seven (7) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Middleton.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate