Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Williamson v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd [2021] FCA 451 Appeal from: Williamson v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd [2021] FCCA 296
File number(s): NSD 263 of 2021
Judgment of: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 3 May 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal from Federal Circuit Court – bankruptcy notice – whether adequate explanation for delay – whether sufficient prospects to justify time being extended – application dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 30(1) and 40(1)(g) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 14(1)(b)
Cases cited: Barton v Malcolm Johns Legal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 166 Clone Pty Ltd v Players Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2018] HCA 12; 264 CLR 165 Guss v Johnstone [2000] HCA 26; 171 ALR 598 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 176; 3 FCR 344 Jackamarra v Krakouer [1998] HCA 27; 195 CLR 516 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 350 Parker v R [2002] FCAFC 133 Williamson v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd [2021] FCCA 296 Williamson v Elders Rural Services Australia Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1986 Williamson v Elders Rural Services Australia Ltd [2019] NSWCA 137 Williamson v Elders Rural Services [2020] NSWSC 933
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate