Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BHL19 v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 462 File number: VID 178 of 2021
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 29 April 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 7 May 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where the applicant's application for a protection visa was refused on character grounds under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the applicant has been detained since his last avenue of appeal in respect of his challenge to the Minister's refusal decision was dismissed – where it is accepted that the applicant has a well-founded fear of persecution and is at risk of serious harm if returned to his country of citizenship – where it is accepted that Australia owes the applicant non-refoulement obligations under international treaties – where the applicant has been and is detained as an unlawful non-citizen under s 189 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the applicant is being detained for the purpose of removal – whether the applicant's removal is being pursued or carried into effect as soon as reasonably practicable – whether the applicant's detention is unlawful – application for relief in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus – whether the Court has power to grant interlocutory relief involving the release of an unlawful non-citizen – whether the Court's power to grant such interlocutory relief has been abrogated by s 196(3) and (6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the decision in AJL20 v Commonwealth [2020] FCA 1305 is plainly wrong – whether the applicant had demonstrated a serious question to be tried in respect of the unlawfulness of his detention – whether the balance of convenience favoured an interlocutory order releasing the applicant from detention – interlocutory application dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate