Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 481 File number: NSD 1262 of 2020
Judgment of: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – application for leave to appeal – leave refused – decision not attendant with sufficient doubt PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – vexatious and embarrassing pleadings – failure to plead material facts – failure to plead material facts of relevance to causes of action PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for reconstitution of the Court – application rejected
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 79 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 31A
Cases cited: ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski [2012] FCA 235, (2012) 291 ALR 46 Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 BIX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1116, (2017) 72 AAR 569 Brilliant Digital Entertainment Pty Ltd v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 270, (2004) 63 IPR 373 Cash's (Australia) Pty Ltd v Foster's Australia Ltd [2013] FCA 695 Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 1490 Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) [2020] FCA 1629 Chandrasekaran v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] FCA 1169 Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [2019] FCA 1687 Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (No 2) [2019] FCA 1028 Clenae Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1999] VSCA 35, (1999) 2 VR 573 Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v United Aircraft Corporation (1943) 68 CLR 525 Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network, G.P [2009] FCA 1446 Hoath v Connect Internet Services Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 158, (2009) 229 ALR 566 Khondoker v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 654 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 77, 228 CLR 470 National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v Sentry Corporation (1988) 19 FCR 155 Nyoni v Chee Koon Hee (No 2) [2014] FCA 83 Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 4) [2012] FCA 1170, (2012) 208 FCR 128 Petroulias v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 795, (2011) 84 ATR 110 Rana v Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 189 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc [2013] FCAFC 138 Sandhurst Trustees Limited v Clarke [2015] FCAFC 21, (2015) 321 ALR 1 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28, (2010) 241 CLR 118 SZSKO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 105 SZTKB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 653
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate