Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lee v Superior Wood Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 515 File number: QUD 378 of 2020
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 19 April 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judicial review of a decision of the Fair Work Commission – where originating application deficient in failing to provide a telephone number pursuant to r 2.16(1)(d) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – where applicant refused to provide telephone number to Court although case management direction to do so – application dismissed for want of compliance with a case management direction
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.16
Cases cited: Lee v Superior Wood Pty Ltd T/A Superior Wood [2019] FWC 5095 Lee v Superior Wood Pty Ltd [2020] FWCFB 1301 Lee v Superior Wood Pty Ltd [2020] FWCFB 6011
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 6
Date of hearing: 19 April 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms L Pendle of Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 378 of 2020
BETWEEN: JEREMY LEE Applicant
AND: SUPERIOR WOOD PTY LTD TRADING AS SUPERIOR WOOD First Respondent
FAIR WORK COMMISSION Second Respondent
order made by: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 19 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Superior Wood Pty Ltd trading as Superior Wood be joined as the first respondent. 2. The Fair Work Commission become the second respondent. 3. The presently named second, third and fourth respondents, namely Vice President Adam Hatcher, Deputy President Amber Millhouse, and Commissioner Peter Hampton be removed as respondent parties. 4. The need for the service of the originating application on the new first respondent be dispensed with. 5. The applicant provide forthwith to the Court his telephone number as required by rule 2.16 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). 6. The proceeding be dismissed for want of compliance with order number 6. 7. No order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate