Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hutchins, in the matter of Ardenberg Pty Ltd (in liq) (Administrators Appointed) (No 3) [2021] FCA 519 File number: NSD 382 of 2018
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 19 May 2021
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for discharge of court-appointed receivers and managers – dispensation of requirement to file and pass accounts under r 14.25 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – release of receivers and managers from claims arising out of or in connection with their appointment as receivers and managers
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 14.25
Cases cited: Gandangara Local Aboriginal Land Council v Gandangara Services Limited [2015] NSWSC 2011 Hutchins, in the matter of Ardenberg Pty Ltd (in liq) (Administrators Appointed) (No 2) [2020] FCA 1424 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Hoogstraten [1985] 1 QB 1077 Kerr, in the matter of Angel's Castle Pre-School Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) [2012] FCA 57 Lunn v Savage [2006] NSWSC 240 Official Assignee in Bankruptcy of the Property of James Adair Hanna v Hanna [2019] FCA 1934 Refund Property Fees Pty Ltd v Prime Project Development (Cairns) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 613 Sprowles, in the matter of Triumph N Triumph Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2021] FCA 405 University of Western Australia v Gray (No 30) [2010] FCA 1063
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate