Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Redflex Holdings Limited, in the matter of Redflex Holdings Limited (No 3) [2021] FCA 527 File number: NSD 178 of 2021
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 19 May 2021
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – second court hearing – order sought under ss 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for approval of the scheme subject to amendment
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 411(4), 411(6), 411(10), 411(11), 411(12), 411(17)(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.34 Saudi Competition Law Art 11
Cases cited: Alchemia Limited, in the matter of Alchemia Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1136 Alchemia Limited, in the matter of Alchemia Limited [2012] FCA 927 iProperty Group Ltd, in the matter of iProperty Group Ltd [2015] FCA 1507 J.P. Morgan Operations Australia Limited v J.P. Morgan Australia Group Pty Limited, in the matter of J.P. Morgan Operations Australia Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1180 Re NRMA Ltd (No 1) [2000] NSWSC 82; 156 FLR 349 Redflex Holdings Limited, in the matter of Redflex Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 474 Redflex Holdings Limited, in the matter of Redflex Holdings Ltd [2021] FCA 417 Tiger Resources Limited, in the matter of Tiger Resources Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 266
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate