Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 558 Appeal from: Application for Leave to Appeal: Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1633
File number: WAD 265 of 2020
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2021
Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM – application for leave to appeal – where leave to appeal is sought from a decision not to join parties – whether the application is competent – effect of s 24(1AA)(b)(i) and s 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 20(3)(c), 24(1)(a), 24(1A), 24(1AA)(a), 24(1AA)(b)(i), 24(1E), 37M, 37M(2), 37M(3), 37M(4), 37N Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.05
Cases cited: Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 817 Irwin v Irwin [2016] FCA 1565 Singh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 956 Tran v Singh [2019] FCA 70 Wilson v South Australia [2017] FCA 219; (2017) 250 FCR 241
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 20
Date of hearing: 28 April 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Mezger
Solicitor for the Applicant: Chapmans Barristers & Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Follett
Solicitor for the Respondent: Kelly Hazell Quill Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate