Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
McCully v Sydney Trains [2021] FCA 562 File number: NSD 507 of 2020
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary dismissal pursuant to s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) or r 26.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) on the basis that there are no reasonable prospects of success – whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the Applicants' claims – whether the immunity provided under s 2B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) applies to the Second Respondent as an employee of the First Respondent – whether the Australian Consumer Law is engaged with respect to the Second Respondent's conduct in making use of postal, telegraphic or telephonic services – whether the Applicants' claim for misleading or deceptive conduct is colourable – application dismissed.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 22(1)(a) Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 50, 236 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 2B, 6, 86(1), 131 Competition Policy Reform Act 1995 (Cth) s 81 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19, 31A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51AC, 52 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01 Australian Consumer Law (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) ss 27-32 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 13A
Cases cited: Agtrack (NT) Pty Ltd v Hatfield [2005] HCA 38; (2005) 223 CLR 251 Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1113; (2009) 180 FCR 313 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 38; (2007) 232 CLR 1 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 3) [2011] FCA 1352; (2011) 206 FCR 264 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [1999] HCA 9; (1999) 198 CLR 334 Bradken Consolidated Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd [1979] HCA 15; (1979) 145 CLR 107 Bride v The Shire of Katanning [2016] FCA 65 Broken Hill Associated Smelters Pty Ltd v Collector of Imposts (Vic) (1918) 25 CLR 61 Bropho v Western Australia [1990] HCA 24; (1990) 171 CLR 1 Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 Ejueyitsi v Victorian Legal Admissions Board [2020] FCA 165 JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236; [2020] 377 ALR 467 Lin v State Rail Authority of NSW [2004] FCAFC 219; (2004) 209 ALR 577 Mason v MWREDC Limited [2011] FCA 1512; (2011) 199 FCR 151 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC 156; (2017) 254 FCR 1 Re Telephone Apparatus Manufacturers' Application [1963] 1 WLR 463 Roberts v Ahern [1904] HCA 17; (1904) 1 CLR 406 Seafolly Pty Ltd v Madden [2012] FCA 1346; (2012) 297 ALR 337 Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] VSC 239; (2012) 266 FLR 243 Unilan Holdings Pty Ltd v Kerin (1993) 94 FCR 481 Woodlands v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1996) 68 FCR 213
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate