Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Frigger v Trenfield (No 8) [2021] FCA 569 File number: WAD 141 of 2019
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to set aside notice to produce documents - documents sought in notice not relevant - any requirement to comply with notice dispensed with
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 30.28
Cases cited: Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Ltd v BlueScope Steel Ltd [2010] FCA 739 Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 5) [2011] FCA 622; (2011) 195 FCR 43 Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 Enagic Co., Ltd v Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1233 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 11) [2006] FCA 174 Suzlon Energy Ltd v Bangad (No 2) [2011] FCA 1152; (2011) 198 FCR 1
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 25
Date of hearing: 27 May 2021
Counsel for the Applicants: The applicants appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr SD Majteles
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Carles Solicitors
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent did not appear
ORDERS WAD 141 of 2019
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate