Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 585 File number: VID 287 of 2021
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 4 June 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders – alleged contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether freezing orders should be made – whether ancillary disclosure orders should be made
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 181, 182 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Division 7.4, rr 7.32, 7.33
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1992) 9 ACSR 404 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Chemical Trustee Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 1064; 90 ATR 711 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (2010) 273 ALR 194 Re Donnelly; Hancock v Porteous [2001] FCA 345 Hyder Consulting (Victoria) Pty Ltd v Transfield Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 315 National Australia Bank Ltd v Bond Brewing Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 271 Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH UND CO KG [1983] 1 WLR 1412 Parbery v QNI Metals Pty Ltd (2018) 358 ALR 88 Pearce v Waterhouse [1986] VR 603 Spotlight Pty Ltd v Mehta [2019] FCA 1796
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate